DRAGONWORX SOLUTIONS

600 metres from the airlock,
with no rover coming.

Rovers and autonomous drones solve most lunar surface mobility. But every mobility programme has failure modes, and a crew member stranded several hundred metres from home base in a pressure suit not optimised for foot travel faces a consumable-limited emergency. We propose a passive augmentation layer that closes that gap at minimal mass, cost and integration complexity.

Who this serves NASA Moon Base programme Lunar surface EVA Mars mission architecture Contingency mobility Crew self-rescue ISRU site survey Analogue-mission testing

A complement to rovers, not a competitor.

The lunar south pole presents rugged crater rims, steep slopes, low-angle lighting, permanently shadowed regions and 280 °C surface temperature swings. Our proposal attaches to the arm-torso junction and leg channels already present in most hard-shell upper torso designs — no pressure system integration, no power connection, no modification to the primary life support interface. A crew member dons or doffs it at the airlock, treating it as emergency traverse equipment analogous to a safety harness: present when needed, stowed otherwise. The stow package folds flat to roughly the size of a personal survival kit.

2–2.5×
Range gain over unassisted lunar movement
35–45 m
Distance per assisted bound
4.5–6 kg
Full augmentation system mass
~0.8 kg
Perceived mass at lunar gravity
The biology underneath

Nothing on the Moon evolved. That is exactly why the transfer analysis matters: every mechanism in the DragonWorx platform was selected by an environment with air, water and 1 g. Strip those away and some mechanisms keep working on pure material physics, some change function entirely, and some become dead mass. Knowing which is which — before anyone builds hardware — is the whole contribution.

PLATFORMS SERVING THIS MARKET

What we build for them.

Primary system

Lunar bounding joints

The JumpSuit leaf-spring architecture is the highest-value transfer to the lunar surface because its mechanism has no dependence on atmosphere. At one-sixth gravity the same stored energy produces a dramatically longer ballistic arc. A crew member covers 600 m in roughly 15–20 assisted strides, arriving at the airlock within minutes rather than the 20–30 minutes an unaugmented EVA shuffle would take — a meaningful difference in a suit approaching consumable limits.

NiTi SMA joints15–20 strides / 600 mVacuum-ratedUHMWPE laminate
Control surface

Ballistic attitude wing

The DragonSuit wing generates no lift in vacuum — we state that plainly. What it does provide is attitude control and landing-posture preparation through the ballistic arc. Without it, a colonist achieves 40 m per bound with high positional error and real landing risk. With it, they achieve 40 m per bound with controllable attitude and a prepared landing. Over a kilometre of traverse, that shifts the technology from impressive stunt to viable transport mode.

Zero lift, real controlFaired helmet + attitude displayStripped of aero-only layers
Mars-primary

Basalt adhesion stack

The GripSuit rough-surface architecture is the strongest Mars candidate in the entire DragonWorx portfolio. Martian basalt surface chemistry is favourable to van der Waals adhesion, and reduced gravity improves the safety margin by roughly 2.5× relative to Earth climbing. For canyon wall survey, lava tube descent and crater rim access, it offers a mobility mode that requires neither anchors nor a powered winch.

Basalt-favourable vdW~2.5× safety marginLava tube accessNo anchors
Environment

Thermal & regolith adaptation

Mass freed by deleting the aerodynamic-only layers goes to aerogel-composite thermal panels and radiation-shielding fabric. The regolith interface is its own engineering problem: electrostatically charged, ultra-fine, near-cohesionless dust defeats conventional boot design, and the compliant clingfish disc geometry manages it substantially better than added mass does.

280 °C swingAerogel compositeRegolith-compliant solePSR-capable
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER — HONEST ACCOUNTING

What survives the vacuum, and what does not.

Most concept work for off-world wearables shows a render and stops. This is the component-by-component verdict, including the four technologies we would delete from a lunar variant entirely.

TechnologyEarth functionLunar / Martian verdict
Resilin leaf-spring joints
JumpSuit
97% elastic energy return at ankle and kneeHighest-value transfer. Works perfectly in vacuum. Delivers ~2–2.5× range gain over unassisted lunar movement; 35–45 m per bound; 15–20 km/h sustained bounding traverse.
SMP rib skeleton
DragonSuit
Holds NACA 4412 wing geometry under aerodynamic loadTransfers with material substitution. DiAPLEX SMP fails at lunar shadow temperatures of −173 °C. Any planetary variant must use NiTi shape-memory alloy instead.
Wing membrane
DragonSuit
Generates lift; 5–6:1 glide ratioFunction changes entirely. Zero aerodynamic lift in vacuum. Survives as a ballistic attitude-control and landing-preparation surface — which converts a dangerous leap into a navigable one.
Gecko + clingfish + remora stack
GripSuit
Multi-surface dry adhesion at body weightHighest-value Mars technology. Basalt surface chemistry favours van der Waals adhesion, and reduced gravity yields roughly a 2.5× safety-margin improvement for climbing.
Shark riblet film8–10% turbulent skin friction reductionDelete. No atmosphere, no boundary layer, no benefit. Mass budget reallocated to thermal insulation.
Tubercle leading edgeDelays stall 22° → 28°Delete. Stall is an aerodynamic phenomenon. Irrelevant in vacuum.
Auxetic cambering panelPassive camber optimisation under dynamic pressureDelete. Requires aerodynamic pressure to actuate. There is none.
Boot / regolith interfaceNew requirement. Regolith is electrostatically charged, ultra-fine and near-cohesionless. The clingfish compliant disc architecture manages it far better than added boot mass.
The state of this work

This is a concept proposal, not a funded programme. It was submitted to the NASA Moon Base collaboration call as a response to the mobility and human surface operations categories. Nothing here has flown, and no component has been tested in a vacuum chamber or a lunar-gravity analogue.

A deeper proposal — the version we would submit on request — would add explicit trajectory mathematics, AxEMU joint interface geometry, a component-level mass breakdown, a full TRL matrix, and a proposed Phase I test protocol. What we have published so far is the physics-first analysis of which technologies transfer and which do not, including the four we would delete outright.

For the full lunar and Martian transfer analysis, trajectory modelling, or programme discussion: getdragons@dragonworx.bio